Methods for adapting over-the-air synchronization to radio conditions

ABSTRACT

Methods for enabling and disabling of muting patterns in Radio Access Network, RAN, nodes allow better detection and use of reference symbols used for synchronization. In some embodiments, coordination of muting patterns amongst different nodes is enabled, so that muting of multiple nodes results in increased protection from interference for the node in need of detecting the synchronization reference symbols. An example method is implemented in a base station operating in a wireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-air synchronization by a neighboring base station. This method includes receiving ( 1210 ) a request for activation of a reference signal muting pattern for a cell supported by the base station and activating ( 1220 ) the reference signal muting pattern in response to the request. The method further includes sending ( 1225 ) a message requesting activation of a reference signal muting pattern for a cell supported by a second base station, in response to the request.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to wireless communicationsystems, and more specifically relates to techniques for reducinginterference to reference signals used for synchronization procedures.

BACKGROUND

The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) is responsible for thestandardization of the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS)and the fourth-generation wireless system commonly known as Long TermEvolution (LTE). The 3GPP work on LTE is also referred to as EvolvedUniversal Terrestrial Access Network (E-UTRAN). LTE is a technology forrealizing high-speed packet-based communication that can reach high datarates both in the downlink (the link carrying transmissions from thebase station to a mobile station) and in the uplink (the link carryingtransmissions from a mobile station to the base station), and is thoughtof as a next-generation mobile communication system relative to UMTS. Inorder to support high data rates, LTE allows for a system bandwidth of20 MHz, or up to 100 MHz when carrier aggregation is employed. LTE isalso able to operate in several different frequency bands and canoperate in at least Frequency-Division Duplex (FDD) and Time-DivisionDuplex (TDD) modes.

In LTE mobile broadband wireless communication systems, transmissionsfrom base stations (referred to in 3GPP documentation as eNBs) to mobilestations (referred to as user equipment, or UEs) are sent usingorthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM). OFDM splits thesignal into multiple parallel sub-carriers in frequency. FIG. 1illustrates the LTE downlink physical resource. The basic unit oftransmission in LTE is a resource block (RB), which in its most commonconfiguration consists of twelve subcarriers and seven OFDM symbols. Thetime interval of seven OFDM symbols is referred to as a “slot.” A unitof one subcarrier and one OFDM symbol is referred to as a resourceelement (RE), which can carry a modulated data symbol. Thus, an RBconsists of 84 REs.

FIG. 2 illustrates the downlink subframe in LTE. An LTE radio subframeis composed of two slots in time and multiple resource blocks infrequency, with the number of RBs determining the bandwidth of thesystem. Furthermore, the two RBs in a subframe that are adjacent in timeare denoted an RB pair. Currently, LTE supports standard bandwidth sizesof 6, 15, 25, 50, 75 and 100 RB pairs.

In the time domain, LTE downlink transmissions are organized into radioframes of 10 milliseconds, each radio frame consisting of tenequally-sized subframes of length Tsubframe=1 millisecond.

The signal transmitted by an eNB in a downlink subframe may betransmitted from multiple antennas, and the signal may be received at aUE that has multiple antennas. The radio channel distorts the signalstransmitted from each of the multiple antenna ports. In order todemodulate any transmissions on the downlink, a UE thus relies onreference symbols (RS) that are transmitted on the downlink. Thesereference symbols and their positions in the time-frequency grid areknown to the UE and can be used to determine channel estimates bymeasuring the effect of the radio channel on these symbols. As ofRelease 11 of the 3GPP specifications for LTE, there are multiple typesof reference symbols. One important type is the common reference symbols(CRS), which are used for channel estimation during demodulation ofcontrol and data messages. The CRS are also used by the UE forsynchronization, i.e., to align the UE's timing with the downlink signalas received from the eNB. The CRS occur once every subframe.

A key improvement to conventional cellular network deployments involvesthe deployment of relatively low-power “small cells” so as to overlay aconventional arrangement of co-called “macro cells.” The result is oftenreferred to as a “heterogeneous network.” Heterogeneous networks, wherethe macro cells and the small cells have vastly different transmitpowers, may be deployed in two main ways. In the first deployment type,the small cell layer and the macro cell layer share the same carrierfrequencies. This approach creates interference between the two layers.In the second deployment type, the small cell layer and macro cell layerare on separate frequencies.

The network architecture for LTE allows messages to be sent between eNBsvia an X2 interface. The eNB also can communicate with other nodes inthe network, e.g., to the Mobility Management Entity (MME) via the S1interface. In FIG. 3, the architecture involving E-UTRAN, i.e., theradio access network (RAN) and the core network (CN), is shown. Incurrent specifications for LTE systems (see, e.g., “S1 ApplicationProtocol,” 3GPP TS 36.413 v12.2.0, available at www.3gpp.org), methodsare specified that allow some self-organizing network (SON)functionality, where an eNB can request information regarding anothereNB via the MME.

As noted above, UEs use CRS transmitted by the eNB to synchronize to theeNB. Many features of 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology, as wellas of other technologies, benefit from the base stations (referred to aseNBs) in the system being synchronized with one another with respect totransmit timing and frequency. Synchronization of eNBs is typically doneusing a global navigation satellite system (GNSS), such as the globalpositioning system (GPS), or by using network-based methods such as IEEE1588v2. However, when such methods are unavailable to an eNB, it ispossible to use LTE reference signals transmitted by other eNBs toacquire synchronization. Such techniques are currently being discussedin 3GPP for small cells in LTE Rel-12, where a small cell can obtainsynchronization from a macro cell or from other small cells.

Currently, a network interface-based signaling approach is used forsynchronization purposes among eNBs. This is enabled by means ofprocedures known as the “S1: eNB Configuration Transfer” and “S1: MMEConfiguration Transfer” procedures, according to the following steps:

-   -   A first eNB, eNB1, generates an eNB Configuration Transfer        message containing a SON Information Transfer information        element (IE).    -   The MME receiving the eNB Configuration Transfer message        forwards the SON Information Transfer IE towards a target eNB,        eNB2, indicated in the IE, by means of the MME Configuration        Transfer message.    -   If the SON Configuration Transfer IE contains a SON Information        Request IE set to “Time synchronization Info,” the receiving        eNB2 may reply with an eNB Configuration Transfer message        towards the eNB1, including a SON Information Reply IE and        Timing Synchronization Information IE, which contains Stratum        Level and Synchronization Status of the sending node.    -   The MME receiving the eNB Configuration Transfer message from        eNB2 forwards it to eNB1 by means of the MME Configuration        Transfer message.

In summary, within an eNB CONFIGURATION TRANSFER message from the eNB tothe MME, it is possible to indicate a target eNB ID and the SONinformation that are required from that target eNB. The MME willtherefore forward such an information request to the target eNB via aprocedure called MME Configuration Transfer. Once the target eNBreceives the request it will reply via the eNB Configuration Transfertowards the MME, which will include the information requested by thesource eNB. The MME will forward the information requested to the sourceeNB by means of a new MME Information Transfer.

If a source eNB requests time synchronization information from a targeteNB, the reply contained in the SON Configuration Transfer IE fromtarget eNB to source eNB should include the above mentioned informationelements (IEs):

-   -   Stratum level: This is the number of hops between the eNB and        the synchronization source. That is, when the stratum level is        M, the eNB is synchronized to an eNB whose stratum level is M-1,        which in turn is synchronized to an eNB with stratum level M-2,        and so on. The eNB with stratum level 0 is the synchronization        source.    -   Synchronization status: This is a flag that indicates whether an        eNB is currently in a synchronous or asynchronous state.        OAM Architecture

The management system architecture assumed for the present discussion isshown in FIG. 4. The node elements (NE), also referred to as eNodeB, aremanaged by a domain manager (DM), which is also referred to as theoperation and support system (OSS). A DM may further be managed by anetwork manager (NM). Two NEs are interfaced by the X2 interface definedby the 3GPP specifications, whereas the interface between two DMs isreferred to by the 3GPP specifications as the Itf-P2P interface. Themanagement system may configure the network elements and may receiveobservations associated to features in the network elements. Forexample, a DM observes and configures NEs, while a NM observes andconfigures DMs, as well as NEs via the intermediate DMs.

By means of configuration via the DM, NM, and related interfaces,functions over the X2 and S1 interfaces can be carried out in acoordinated way throughout the RAN, eventually involving the CoreNetwork, i.e., the MME and S-GWs.

Radio Interface-Based Synchronization (RIBS)

In recent progress in 3GPP RAN1's work, it was concluded that it wouldbe beneficial, for synchronization purposes, to make use of patterns oftime-frequency transmission resources that are selectively muted toensure low interference, thus enabling RAN nodes in need of over-the-airsynchronization to decode a synchronization reference signal that wouldotherwise be affected by neighbor cell interference and thus not usable.In particular, the resource elements in these muted patterns should befree from any reference signal or any other interfering signal'stransmissions.

3GPP working group discussion documents R3-140997, “LS on Status ofRadio-Interface Based Synchronization” (available athttp://www.3gpp.org/FTP/tsg_ran/WG3_lu/TSGR3_84/LSin/) and R1-142762,“LS on Radio Interface Based Synchronization” (available athttp://www.3gpp.org/Liaisons/Outgoing_LSs/R1-meeting.htm), describe theagreements taken by RAN1 in terms of what characteristics such patternsshould have.

In summary, the agreements state that the network should support theenabling of patterns of interference-protected time/frequency resources.These patterns can repeat themselves in time according to a periodselected from a range specified in the latter of the two documentsspecified immediately above. It should be noted that these patterns aredifferent from existing Almost Blank Subframes patterns, which are usedfor enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC). Onedifference is that in ABS patterns, reference signals are transmittedwithout interruption, which is one of the reasons why such patterns aremade of so-called “Almost” blank subframes.

The 3GPP discussion documents identified above specify that thereference signals that a RAN node can use to achieve synchronizationcould be different, and that the interference protected patterns shouldtherefore ensure protection towards all reference signals. In summary,the information from these documents that are relevant to thespecification of signaling needed to make the radio interface-basedsynchronization mechanisms work are as follows.

Excerpts from R3-140997 (cited above):

Agreement:

-   -   Specify listening RS(s) including RS pattern, and subframe        periodicity, and offset, for both FDD and TDD

Agreement:

-   -   PRS and/or CRS is used as the listening RS for RIBS        -   FFS: Down-select of listening RS    -   Subframe-level muting is supported for RIBS

Excerpts from R1-142762 (cited above):

-   -   For network listening, the following RS pattern is supported by        configuration        -   CRS only            -   The number of CRS ports can be 1 or 2        -   CRS and PRS            -   The number of CRS ports can be 1 or 2    -   The eNB should use one periodicity and offset of network        listening RS that can be selected from the following recommended        range of values        -   A range of values (>=2) for the periodicity            -   Choose all or a subset from [1280 ms, 2560 ms, 5120 ms,                10240 ms]            -   There is no consensus in RAN1 on the additional                periodicities of 640 ms and 20480 ms        -   Values of offsets FFS    -   The max number of hops is kept at 3.

While the documents above provide a starting point for enablinginterference protection for over-the-air synchronization measurements,further work is needed to provide complete solutions.

SUMMARY

The agreements taken in the RAN1 working group of 3GPP leave unresolvedthe problem of how to enable inter-node communication aimed atcoordinating the enabling of interference-protected patterns.Embodiments of the presently disclosed techniques and apparatus thusinclude methods for enabling and disabling of muting patterns in RANnodes for the purpose of allowing better detection and use of referencesymbols (RS) used for synchronization.

Some of these methods allow a node to request activation or deactivationof muting patterns. In response, the nodes involved in enabling RIBSmuting patterns are allowed to flexibly select the patterns and patternperiod that best suits their conditions, for example, to select thepatterns and pattern periods that best fit with the resource demands ofcurrent traffic.

In a number of embodiments, coordination of muting patterns amongstdifferent nodes is enabled, so that muting of multiple nodes results inincreased protection from interference for the node in need of detectingthe synchronization RS. Also, in other embodiments, activation requeststowards a single node may trigger enabling of muting patterns in a widerset of cells. This latter approach reduces the amount of signalingneeded and provides immediate alleviation from interference frommultiple RAN nodes' cells.

According to a first aspect of the techniques and apparatus disclosedherein, a method is implemented in a base station operating in awireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization by a neighboring base station. This method includesreceiving a request for activation of a reference signal muting patternfor a cell supported by the base station and activating the referencesignal muting pattern in response to the request. The method furtherincludes sending a message requesting activation of a reference signalmuting pattern for a cell supported by a second base station, inresponse to the request

According to a second aspect, another method is implemented in a controlnode operating in a wireless communications network, for facilitatingover-the-air synchronization by a first base station with a firstneighbor cell of a plurality of neighbor cells, the method comprisingreceiving a first message from the first base station. The first messageindicates that reference signal muting by one or more of the pluralityof neighbor cells is needed. The method further comprises determiningthat a muting pattern should be activated for at least a second neighborcell, based on at least the identity of the first base station or thefirst cell, where the first message does not identify the secondneighbor cell. The method further comprises sending a second message toat least a second base station, corresponding to the second neighborcell, the second message requesting activation of a reference signalmuting pattern for the second neighbor cell.

According to a third aspect, another method is implemented in a controlnode operating in a wireless communications network, for facilitatingover-the-air synchronization by a first base station with a firstneighbor cell of a plurality of neighbor cells. This method comprisessending a first configuration message to a first base station, theconfiguration message identifying a first reference signal mutingpattern for use in a first cell corresponding to the first base station.The method further comprises sending a second configuration message to asecond base station, the second configuration message identifying asecond reference signal muting pattern for use in a second cellcorresponding to the second base station, where the first and secondreference signal muting patterns comprise one or more common mutedresources.

According to a fourth aspect, a base station is configured for operatingin a wireless communications network and to facilitate over-the-airsynchronization by a neighboring base station. The base station isadapted to receive a request for activation of a reference signal mutingpattern for a cell supported by the base station and to activate thereference signal muting pattern in response to the request. The basestation is further adapted to send a message requesting activation of areference signal muting pattern for a cell supported by a second basestation, in response to the request

According to a fifth aspect, a control node is configured for operatingin a wireless communications network and to facilitate over-the-airsynchronization among base stations. The control node is adapted toreceive a first message from a first base station, the first messageindicating that reference signal muting by one or more of the pluralityof neighbor cells is needed. The control node is further adapted todetermine that a muting pattern should be activated for at least asecond neighbor cell, based on at least the identity of the first basestation or the first cell, wherein the first message does not identifythe second neighbor cell. The control node is still further adapted tosend a second message to at least a second base station, correspondingto the second neighbor cell, the second message requesting activation ofa reference signal muting pattern for the second neighbor cell.

According to a sixth aspect, a control node is configured for operatingin a wireless communications network and to facilitate over-the-airsynchronization among base stations. The control node is adapted to senda first configuration message to a first base station, the configurationmessage identifying a first reference signal muting pattern for use in afirst cell corresponding to the first base station. The control node isfurther adapted to send a second configuration message to a second basestation, the second configuration message identifying a second referencesignal muting pattern for use in a second cell corresponding to thesecond base station, where the first and second reference signal mutingpatterns comprise one or more common muted resources.

Other embodiments of the techniques and apparatus described hereininclude computer program products comprising program instructions forcarrying out one or more of the methods summarized above and/or variantsthereof, as well as computer-readable media embodying any one or more ofthese computer program products.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates time-frequency resources in a system using OrthogonalFrequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM).

FIG. 2 illustrates a subframe in an LTE system.

FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified version of the architecture of theE-UTRAN system.

FIG. 4 illustrates a management architecture.

FIG. 5 is another view of the E-UTRAN system.

FIG. 6 illustrates components of an example user equipment.

FIG. 7 illustrates components of an example base station.

FIG. 8 shows an example scenario in which the presently disclosedtechniques may be employed.

FIG. 9 is a signal flow diagram illustrating some embodiments of thepresently disclosed techniques.

FIG. 10 is another signal flow diagram, again illustrating someembodiments of the presently disclosed techniques.

FIG. 11 is a process flow diagram illustrating an example methodaccording to some of the disclosed techniques.

FIG. 12 is another process flow diagram illustrating an example methodaccording to some of the disclosed techniques.

FIG. 13 is still another process flow diagram illustrating an examplemethod according to some of the disclosed techniques.

FIG. 14 is another process flow diagram illustrating an example methodaccording to some of the disclosed techniques.

FIG. 15 illustrates components of an example base station or controlnode, according to various embodiments of the presently disclosedtechniques and apparatus.

FIGS. 16, 17, and 18 are functional representations of an example basestation and example control nodes, according to various embodiments ofthe presently disclosed techniques and apparatus.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the discussion that follows, specific details of particularembodiments of the presently disclosed techniques and apparatus are setforth for purposes of explanation and not limitation. It will beappreciated by those skilled in the art that other embodiments may beemployed apart from these specific details. Furthermore, in someinstances detailed descriptions of well-known methods, nodes,interfaces, circuits, and devices are omitted so as not to obscure thedescription with unnecessary detail. Those skilled in the art willappreciate that the functions described may be implemented in one or inseveral nodes.

Some or all of the functions described may be implemented using hardwarecircuitry, such as analog and/or discrete logic gates interconnected toperform a specialized function, ASICs, PLAs, etc. Likewise, some or allof the functions may be implemented using software programs and data inconjunction with one or more digital microprocessors or general purposecomputers. Where nodes that communicate using the air interface aredescribed, it will be appreciated that those nodes also have suitableradio communications circuitry. Moreover, the technology canadditionally be considered to be embodied entirely within any form ofcomputer-readable memory, including non-transitory embodiments such assolid-state memory, a magnetic disk, or optical disk containing anappropriate set of computer instructions that would cause a processor tocarry out the techniques described herein.

Hardware implementations may include or encompass, without limitation,digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, a reduced instruction setprocessor, hardware (e.g., digital or analog) circuitry including butnot limited to application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC) and/orfield programmable gate array(s) (FPGA(s)), and (where appropriate)state machines capable of performing such functions.

In terms of computer implementation, a computer is generally understoodto comprise one or more processors or one or more controllers, and theterms computer, processor, and controller may be employedinterchangeably. When provided by a computer, processor, or controller,the functions may be provided by a single dedicated computer orprocessor or controller, by a single shared computer or processor orcontroller, or by a plurality of individual computers or processors orcontrollers, some of which may be shared or distributed. Moreover, theterm “processor” or “controller” also refers to other hardware capableof performing such functions and/or executing software, such as theexample hardware recited above.

References throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “anembodiment” mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristicdescribed in connection with an embodiment is included in at least oneembodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearance of the phrases“in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughoutthe specification are not necessarily all referring to the sameembodiment. Further, the particular features, structures orcharacteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or moreembodiments.

While the following examples are described in the context of LTEsystems, the principles described in the following disclosure may beequally applied to other cellular networks. Other wireless systems,including WCDMA, WiMax, UMB and GSM, may also benefit from exploitingthe techniques described herein. Also note that the use of terminologysuch as eNodeB and UE should be considering non-limiting, and does notnecessarily imply a certain hierarchical relation between the two; ingeneral, an “eNodeB” could be considered as a first wireless device anda “UE” as a second wireless device, where these two devices communicatewith one another over a radio channel. Similarly, when talking aboutsignaling over an X2 backhaul, the solutions are not necessarily limitedto communication between eNBs but the communicating nodes can be anynode terminating the backhaul interface over which the informationdescribed is transmitted.

FIG. 5 is another view of an E-UTRAN architecture, as part of anLTE-based communications system 2. Nodes in the core network 4 includeone or more Mobility Management Entities (MMEs) 6, which are key controlnodes for the LTE access network, and one or more Serving Gateways(SGWs) 8, which route and forward user data packets while acting asmobility anchors. The MMEs 6 and SGWs 8 communicate with base stations10 referred to in LTE as eNBs, over interfaces specified by the 3GPPstandards, such as the S1 interface. The eNBs 10 can include two or moreof the same or different categories of eNBs, e.g., macro eNBs, and/ormicro/pico/femto eNBs. The eNBs 10 communicate with one another over aninterface, for example an X2 interface. The S1 interface and X2interface are defined in the LTE standard. A UE 12 can receive downlinkdata from and send uplink data to one of the base stations 10, with thatbase station 10 being referred to as the serving base station of the UE12. It should be appreciated that while the techniques described hereinmay be applied in the context of an E-UTRAN network, e.g., asillustrated in FIGS. 3 and 5, the techniques may also be applied inother network contexts, including in UTRA networks, or even inpeer-to-peer communications, such as in an ad-hoc network or in aso-called device-to-device scenario.

In some of the embodiments described herein, the non-limiting terms“user equipment” and “UE” are used. A UE, as that term is used herein,can be any type of wireless device capable of communicating with anetwork node or another UE over radio signals, including an MTC deviceor M2M device. A UE may also be referred to as a mobile station, a radiocommunication device, or a target device, and the term is intended toinclude device-to-device UEs, machine-type UEs or UEs capable ofmachine-to-machine communication, sensors equipped with a UE,wireless-enabled table computers, mobile terminals, smart phones,laptop-embedded equipped (LEE), laptop-mounted equipment (LME), USBdongles, wireless customer-premises equipment (CPE), etc.

FIG. 6 shows a user equipment (UE) 12 that can be used in one or more ofthe systems described herein. The UE 12 comprises a processing module 30that controls the operation of the UE 12. The processing module 30,which may comprise one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers,digital signal processors, specialized digital logic, etc., is connectedto a receiver or transceiver module 32 with associated antenna(s) 34which are used to receive signals from and/or to transmit signals to abase station 10 in the network 2. The user equipment 12 also comprises amemory circuit 36 that is connected to the processing module 30 and thatstores program code and other information and data required for theoperation of the UE 12. Together, the processing module and memorycircuit may be referred to as a “processing circuit,” and are adapted,in various embodiments, to carry out one or more of any UE-basedtechniques described below.

In the description of some embodiments below, the generic terminology“radio network node” or simply “network node (NW node)” is used. Theseterms refer to any kind of wireless network node, such as a basestation, a radio base station, a base transceiver station, a basestation controller, a network controller, an evolved Node B (eNB), aNode B, a relay node, a positioning node, a E-SMLC, a location server, arepeater, an access point, a radio access point, a Remote Radio Unit(RRU) Remote Radio Head (RRH), a multi-standard radio (MSR) radio nodesuch as MSR BS nodes in distributed antenna system (DAS), a SON node, anO&M, OSS, or MDT node, a core network node, an MME, etc.

FIG. 7 shows a base station 10 (for example a NodeB or an eNodeB) thatcan be used in example embodiments described. It will be appreciatedthat although a macro eNB will not in practice be identical in size andstructure to a micro eNB, these different examples of base station 10will generally include similar or corresponding components, although thedetails of each of those components may vary to accommodate thedifferent operational requirements of a particular embodiment.

The illustrated base station 10 comprises a processing module 40 thatcontrols the operation of the base station 10. The processing module 40,which may comprise one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers,digital signal processors, specialized digital logic, etc., is connectedto a transceiver module 42 with associated antenna(s) 44, which are usedto transmit signals to, and receive signals from, user equipments 12 inthe network 2. The base station 10 also comprises a memory circuit 46that is connected to the processing module 40 and that stores programand other information and data required for the operation of the basestation 10. Together, the processing module 40 and memory circuit 46 maybe referred to as a “processing circuit,” and are adapted, in variousembodiments, to carry out one or more of the network-based techniquesdescribed below.

The base station 10 also includes components and/or circuitry 48 forallowing the base station 10 to exchange information with other basestations 10 (for example, via an X2 interface) and components and/orcircuitry 49 for allowing the base station 10 to exchange informationwith nodes in the core network 4 (for example, via the S1 interface). Itwill be appreciated that base stations for use in other types of network(e.g., UTRAN or WCDMA RAN) will include similar components to thoseshown in FIG. 7 and appropriate interface circuitry 48, 49 for enablingcommunications with the other network nodes in those types of networks(e.g., for communications with other base stations, mobility managementnodes and/or nodes in the core network).

It will be appreciated that other nodes in the communication network mayhave a structure that is similar to that illustrated in the FIG. 7, withthe transceiver module 42 omitted in those nodes that are not radio basestations. Nodes in the core network may have a RAN network interfacecircuit in place of core network interface circuit 49, in someembodiments.

As noted above, many features of 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE)technology, as well as of other technologies, benefit from the basestations (referred to as eNBs) in the system being synchronized with oneanother with respect to transmit timing and frequency. Synchronizationof eNBs is typically done using a global navigation satellite system(GNSS) such as the global positioning system (GPS) or by usingnetwork-based methods such as IEEE 1588v2. However, when such methodsare unavailable to an eNB, it may be possible to use LTE referencesignals transmitted by other eNBs to acquire synchronization. Suchtechniques are currently being discussed in 3GPP for small cells in LTERel-12, where a small cell can obtain synchronization from a macro cellor from other small cells.

The problem addressed by the presently disclosed techniques andapparatus is how to enable a mechanism that allows the RAN node in needof synchronization to correctly detect and use the most appropriatesynchronization reference signal. More particularly these techniquesfacilitate the enabling of a pattern of resources protected frominterference, on which the node can listen to the synchronization RS andsynchronize to it. Such a pattern will be also referred to as a “mutingpattern” or “RIBS muting pattern” herein.

The enabling of a muting pattern should depend on whether there is anode in need of interference protection for synchronization purposes.Indeed, keeping a set of time-frequency resources muted in any cellgenerally results in a loss of resources and a decrease of systemperformance. Therefore, the techniques described herein allow activationand deactivation of muting patterns from relevant interfering cellsdepending on whether there are nodes in need of synchronizing to othercells that would benefit from such interference protected patterns.

Another problem the presently disclosed techniques and apparatus addressis how to achieve coordination of muting patterns and the activation ofmuting patterns. Namely, the Radio Access Network (RAN) node in chargeof activating muting patterns is the only node aware of the trafficdemand on the node at activation time. It should therefore be up to thisnode to decide the amount of muting to apply that is feasible, given thetraffic demand that is currently sustained. At the same time, it wouldbe beneficial to address methods that enable a wider number of cellsinterfering at the same time with the synchronization RS to activatecoordinated muting patterns, i.e., muting patterns sharing the samemuting resources.

In the 3GPP discussion document R3-14121, “Discussion on How to SupportRIBS” (available athttp://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Meetings_3GPP_SYNC/RAN3/Docs/), solutions tryingto address the signaling of muting pattern information for RIBS purposesare presented. However, all of the presented solutions are subject toseveral shortfalls. First, the solutions proposed are suboptimal andinefficient because they all rely on an indication, sent from the nodein need of synchronization to the node selected for synchronization,where the indication informs the receiving node that synchronizationwill happen with one of its cells. This indication is unnecessarybecause, upon selection of a synchronization node, there are no changesin the mode of operation of the node that is providing synchronizationsignals. Therefore this indication results in unnecessary signaling.Second, these solutions are non-scalable and inefficient because theyare based on the communication of muting patterns from the node in needof synchronization to the interfering nodes. The node in need ofsynchronization is unaware of the load demand conditions of theinterfering nodes and would not be able to accurately determine how muchresource muting the interfering node would be able to afford. Inaddition, in the event that a second node in need of synchronizationrequested the same interfering node to activate a different mutingpattern, the interfering node may have either to reject the request dueto an excessive overall amount of resources to mute or it may accept it,with the consequence of a higher loss of capacity due to different,possibly non-overlapping, muting patterns

Embodiments of the presently disclosed invention enable the exchange ofinformation about the possibility of activating muting patterns atinterfering cells that would allow a node that needs to correctly andtimely decode a synchronization signal to do so.

These embodiments also allow activation and deactivation of mutingpatterns to occur only when needed. Namely, resources are muted onlywhen there is a need for interference reduction for the purpose ofsynchronization, in some embodiments, avoiding unnecessary losses incapacity.

Embodiments also allow a node that receives a request to mute resourcesto select an appropriate muting pattern according to its trafficconditions and cell status.

Also detailed below are implementation-specific simplifications ofmuting pattern activation and deactivation mechanisms, where muting canbe activated simultaneously on a number of nodes and cells. The lattercan be determined by the stratum number of a node or by an existingunderstanding of the interfering cells for a given node in need ofsynchronization.

Embodiments allow for coordination of muting patterns amongst differentnodes, so to allow for maximum interference protection on mutedresources, while minimizing capacity losses.

In order to explain a first method according to some embodiments of theinvention, an example scenario is detailed here. In particular, thescenario takes as an example the LTE system, and consists of a casewhere an eNB detects a cell's reference signal suitable forsynchronization, where the synchronization source has a stratum numberlower than other detected RSs. (It will be appreciated that perconvention, the lower the stratum level, the higher the signal accuracyis with respect to an ultimate synchronization source such as GNSS.) Inthis scenario, it would be beneficial if other cells interfering withthe synchronization signal could adopt a muting pattern where all RSsare muted in certain subframes, according to a certain pattern that canrepeat with a certain period, e.g., as in the 3GPP documents R3-140997and R1-142762 mentioned above.

FIG. 8 illustrates a possible scenario where such radio interface-basedsynchronization (RIBS) may be needed. In FIG. 8 it can be seen that CellS emits a reference signal that is GNSS-synchronized. eNB C, whichserves Cell C and may serve mobile station MS A, for instance, candeduce such information via, for example, S1 signaling of the SONInformation IE, namely by receiving a Time Synchronization Info IE wherethe Stratum Level IE has been set to “0”, as per specifications in 3GPPTS 36.413, v12.2.0.

Similarly, eNB A, which serves Cell A, can deduce that Cell C is abetter synchronization source than Cell B and may try to use Cell C's RSto synchronize. However, in order to achieve correct detection of CellC's RS, eNB A needs to be protected from interference from Cell B.

For this reason, RAN1 has agreed that it would be beneficial toestablish a subframe-muting pattern, i.e., a pattern of subframes whereall RS signals of interfering cells are muted.

As an assumption of a first method to be detailed below, it isconsidered that the set of muting patterns available for activation incells of a RAN node does not change frequently. Therefore, thesepatterns can be configured from a centralized entity such as the OAM, sothat the RAN node has a set of muting patterns available for activationat any given time.

According to some embodiments of the techniques detailed below, mutingpatterns in a RAN node's cells are activated and deactivated only whenneeded. Such activation and deactivation shall be triggered by specificevents. For example, if a RAN node decides to perform over-the-airsynchronization using a neighbor cell's RS signal that is considered thebest synchronization source available, and if such synchronizationrequires other neighbor cells to mute (or reduce interference on)time-frequency resources in order to properly decode the signal, thenmuting patterns in those other neighbor cells need to be activated.Further, such patterns would need to be deactivated as soon as they areno longer needed, for example if the source of synchronization RS is notavailable any longer or if a better synchronization signal not requiringmuting from neighbor cells becomes available.

Activation and deactivation of muting patterns are both important. Infact, maintaining muting patterns activated when the muting patterns arenot needed would incur a loss of time-frequency resources and thereforea degradation of system performance and reduced capacity.

On the basis of the observations above, one way to achieve activationand deactivation of muting patterns could include the following steps,all or some of which may be used in various embodiments:

-   -   Advertising the availability of muting patterns by means of        dedicated signaling or by enhancing existing signaling. For        example, in the case of LTE this might consist of enhancing the        SON Information Reply IE (received as a consequence of sending a        SON Information Request IE set to “Time Synchronization Info”)        with new information flagging muting patterns availability.    -   Enabling a RAN node (for example an eNB suffering from neighbor        cells' interference) to request neighbor RAN nodes' activation        of muting patterns, by means of dedicated signaling or by        enhancing existing signaling. For example, in the case of LTE        this might consist of enhancing the SON Information Request IE        with information indicating an activation request. The RAN node        could also request the specific resources that should be muted,        i.e., the pattern and periodicity.    -   Enabling a RAN node (for example an aggressor eNB) to signal        muting patterns and patterns period by means of dedicated        signaling or by enhancing existing signaling. For example, in        the case of LTE this might consist of enhancing the SON        Information Reply IE with new information indicating a chosen        muting pattern, a pattern period and other related information.    -   Enabling a RAN node (for example an eNB) to request        de-activation of muting patterns by means of dedicated signaling        or by enhancing existing signaling. For example, in the case of        LTE this might consist of enhancing the SON Information Request        IE with information requesting deactivation of muting patterns.

In the case of an LTE system the above steps can be achieved by means ofthe example procedures shown in FIG. 9, which illustrates an examplesignaling procedure to enable/disable muting patterns for RIBS.

FIG. 9 can be described as follows:

Messages 1-2) An eNB1 in need of synchronization detects one or morecells from eNB2 and eNB3 and sends an eNB Configuration Transfer messagewith SON Information Request IE set to “Time Synchronization Info” toeNB2 and eNB3. The SON Information Request IE will be transparentlyforwarded as part of an MME Configuration Transfer to the target eNB2and eNB3.

Messages 3-4) eNB 2 and eNB3 respond with an eNB Configuration Transfermessage containing the SON Information Reply IE. This IE containsinformation such as the Time Synchronization Information IE and inaddition it contains a new optional flag stating whether RIBS mutingpatterns are available for activation or not (for example, the mutingpatterns may not be available because they are not supported in thereceiving eNB or because traffic conditions are such that no muting canbe supported). The information will be forwarded to eNB1 in MMEConfiguration Transfer messages

Messages 5-6) eNB1 evaluates which RS signals among cells of eNB2 andeNB3 are the best available. Such evaluation may be done on the basis ofparameters such as signal strength, eNB stratum level, synchronizationstatus. Assuming that one of eNB3's cells is the best synchronizationsource, eNB1 determines that for correct detection of RS from eNB3, RSsignals from eNB2 need to be muted. Therefore, eNB1 sends an eNBConfiguration Transfer message towards eNB2 with a SON InformationRequest IE set to a new value, e.g., “Activate RIBS Pattern”.

The message may also contain a list of cells for which the mutingpattern should be applied, depending on which cells the eNB1 considersto be the strongest interfering cells. In addition, the message may alsocontain the set of resources which should be muted, e.g., subframepattern and periodicity. Multiple options for such muting could beprovided with some of the options being subsets of others.

Messages 7-8) eNB2, namely the interfering eNB, selects the pattern andpattern periodicity that best suits its conditions such as traffic loadand enables such pattern for the cells indicated by eNB1. eNB2 respondswith an eNB Configuration Transfer message towards eNB1, where the SONInformation Reply IE contains RIBS muting patterns characteristics andlist of cells for which the patterns have been enabled

Messages 9-10) At a later point in time, it may occur that muting fromeNB2's cells may no longer be needed. For example, eNB1 may not need theRS of eNB3 as source of synchronization or indeed it may happen thateNB3's signals become unavailable. In this case, eNB1 may requestdeactivation of the muting patterns via an eNB Configuration Transfermessage towards eNB2 where the SON Information Request IE or another newor existing IE has been set to a new value such as “Deactivate RIBSPattern”. Optionally, a list of cells for which deactivation has tooccur can be specified.

The procedure described in FIG. 9 follows two simple and advantageousprinciples, namely: reusing existing procedures to exchange informationabout RIBS muting patterns and enabling activation and deactivation ofmuting patterns.

Note that by reusing existing procedures it is possible to savesignaling messages. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, a SON InformationReply IE may contain both “Time Synchronization Information” and anindication of RIBS muting patterns availability.

In one variation of the method above, the RAN node receiving the mutingpattern activation request does not reply with a muting pattern but onlywith a pattern period. The assumption in this case would be that mutingpatterns are configured in each RAN node in a given neighborhood in sucha way that each node knows what pattern is supported by a node where anactivation request is sent.

In another variation of the above method, the exchange of informationrelative to muting patterns activation and deactivation may occur viathe X2 interface. A number of procedures can be used to enable suchinformation exchange, for example: X2: Load Information, X2: ResourceInformation Request/Response/Update, X2 Setup Request/Response, eNBConfiguration Update.

An example of how such procedure can be enabled over X2 is provided inFIG. 10, which shows an example of the exchange of information regardingRIBS muting patterns over X2. In FIG. 10 it is assumed that signalingenabling eNB1 to discover which node is the best synchronization sourcehas already occurred. Such signaling could consist of reusing the S1:eNB Configuration Transfer and S1: MME Configuration Transfer messagesor it could consist of new X2 signaling that carries equivalentinformation.

It is also assumed that eNB1 knows whether support for RIBS mutingpatterns is available at eNB2 and eNB3. This can be achieved via thetechniques outlined above, or via new signaling over X2.

FIG. 10 can be described as follows:

Message 1: RIBS muting pattern activation is shown in message 1 and itis achieved by means of enhancing the LOAD INFORMATION message andadding a new code value to the Invoke Indication IE. Such new valuecould be set to “Activate RIBS Pattern” or any equivalent valuetriggering an activation request. The activation request can be sent toone or more cells that can be identified in the message by means oftheir Cell IDs. The request can also include a requested muting patternand periodicity or a set of multiple patterns and periodicities. Ifmultiple patterns are provided, some patterns and periodicities can be asubset of others.

Message 2: eNB analyzes whether muting patterns can be activated. Ifthis is possible, it enables muting patterns and sends muting patternstructures, pattern periods and the cell identifier to which each of thespecified patterns applies in a LOAD INFORMATION message back to eNB1.

Message 3: In the case where muting patterns from eNB2 do not need to beactive anymore, eNB1 may send an X2: LOAD INDICATION message where theInvoke Indication IE has been set to a new value indicating deactivationof the muting pattern. This new value may be set for example to“Deactivate RIBS Pattern” or any equivalent value triggering adeactivation request. The deactivation request can be sent to one ormore cells that can be identified in the message by means of their CellIDs.

In view of the discussion presented above, it will be appreciated thatthe process flow diagrams of FIGS. 11-13 illustrate examples of methodscarried out in accordance with the presently disclosed techniques.

FIG. 11, for example, illustrates a method in a base station operatingin a wireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization with a neighboring base station. As shown at block 1110,the method includes determining that a first neighbor cell of aplurality of neighbor cells is a desired synchronization source. Themethod further includes determining that a second neighbor cell of theplurality of neighbor cells is interfering with or is likely tointerfere with a signal, from the first neighbor cell, that is used forsynchronization, as shown at block 1120. In response, as shown at block1130, a request for activation of a reference signal muting pattern bythe second neighbor cell is sent towards the second base station. Insome embodiments, the request for activation is sent to a controllingnode in the wireless communications network, where the controlling nodecontrols a base station corresponding to the second cell. In otherembodiments, the request for activation is sent directly to the basestation corresponding to the second cell.

As shown at blocks 1140 and 1150, the method further includessubsequently determining that the signal from the first neighbor cell isnot needed or is unavailable for synchronization and, in response,sending a message, towards the second neighbor cell, indicating that thereference signal muting pattern may be deactivated.

In some embodiments of the illustrated method, determining that thefirst neighbor cell is a desired synchronization source comprisesreceiving synchronization information from at least the first neighborcell, the synchronization information indicating at least one of astratum level and synchronization status, and evaluating the receivedsynchronization information. In some embodiments, determining that thefirst neighbor cell is a desired synchronization source is based atleast in part on a signal strength of a signal received from the firstneighbor cell.

Some embodiments further comprise receiving an indication of whether areference signal muting pattern is available for the second neighborcell. In these embodiments, sending the request for activation of thereference signal muting pattern is responsive to receiving saidindication. The indication may comprise or be associated with anidentification of one or more muting patterns available for the secondneighbor cell, in some embodiments. In these and in other embodiments,the request for activation of the reference signal muting patternincludes a list of cells for which a muting pattern should be applied,and/or includes an identification of one or more resources that shouldbe muted. This identification of resources may comprise a subframepattern, or a pattern periodicity, or both.

Although not shown in FIG. 11, synchronization can be performed based onthe signal from the first neighbor cell. In some embodiments, this maybe based on receiving information identifying which resources are beingmuted or are to be muted by the second neighbor cell.

FIG. 12 illustrates a related method, in a base station operating in awireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization by a neighboring base station. As shown at blocks 1210and 1220, the illustrated method includes receiving a request foractivation of a reference signal muting pattern for a cell supported bythe base station and activating the reference signal muting pattern inresponse to the request. In some embodiments the request for activationis received from another base station via a base station-to-base stationinterface. In others, the request for activation is received from acontrolling node in the wireless communications network. As shown atblocks 1230 and 1240, a request to deactivate the reference signalmuting pattern is subsequently received and the reference signal mutingpattern is deactivated, in response.

Although not shown in FIG. 12, the illustrated operations may bepreceded, in some embodiments, by the receiving of a request forsynchronization information and responding with synchronizationinformation that includes at least an indication that one or morereference signal muting patterns is/are available. The synchronizationinformation may include an identification of one or more resources thatare muted in at least a first reference signal muting pattern; thisidentification may comprise a subframe pattern, or a patternperiodicity, or both.

In some cases, the receiving of the message 1210 may trigger thereceiving node to request activation of a reference signal mutingpattern by one or more additional base stations and/or for one or moreadditional cells. Thus, in some embodiments, the method shown in FIG. 12is extended by the sending of a message requesting activation of areference signal muting pattern for a cell supported by a second basestation, as shown at block 1225. This message is sent to the second basestation, in some embodiments, or to a control node in the wirelesscommunications network, in some others. The second base station may beselected based on an evaluation of its synchronization stratum level, insome embodiments, and/or based on an evaluation of its potential forinterfering with one or more cells supported by the neighbor basestation.

FIG. 13 illustrates a method, implemented in a control node operating ina wireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization by a first base station with a first neighbor cell of aplurality of neighbor cells. As shown at block 1310, the method includesreceiving a first message from the first base station, the first messageindicating that reference signal muting by at least a second neighborcell of the plurality of neighbor cells is needed. As shown at block1320, the method continues the sending of a second message to at least asecond base station corresponding to the second neighbor cell, thesecond message requesting activation of a reference signal mutingpattern for the second neighbor cell.

In some embodiments, the first message does not identify the secondneighbor cell and the method further comprises determining that a mutingpattern should be activated for at least the second neighbor cell basedon at least the identity of the requesting base station or itscorresponding cell. This is shown at block 1315 in FIG. 13. In some ofthese embodiments, determining that a muting pattern should be activatedfor at least the second neighbor cell comprises determining that thesecond neighbor cell is an interferer to a cell corresponding to therequesting base station.

The illustrated method can be extended to facilitate the muting ofreference signals for additional cells. Thus, in some embodiments, themethod shown in FIG. 13 is extended by the sending of the second messageor a corresponding message to at least a third base stationcorresponding to a third neighbor cell, such that the second message orcorresponding message requests activation of a reference signal mutingpattern for the third neighbor cell.

In one implementation-specific embodiment of the methods describedabove, the configuration of RIBS muting patterns at different RAN nodesis done in such a way that the patterns for two or more base stationsshare part or all of the muted resources. Namely, a configuration nodesuch as the OAM system can configure RIBS muting patterns in differentRAN nodes in a way that they will enable muting of all or a group of RANnodes activating the patterns on at least a subset of muted resources.This is important because it allows interference reduction on at least asubset of resources even when more nodes are involved in activation ofmuting patterns.

In a variation, the coordination node may configure coordinated patterns(for example the same patterns) for all RAN nodes having the samestratum level. In this case, the RAN node grouping for muting patternscoordination purposes would be done on the basis of Stratum Level.Grouping of RAN nodes or cells for the purpose of assigning coordinatedmuting patterns can be done according to any of one or more differentcriteria, for example their maximum transmission powers, cell types(e.g. macro, micro, pico), etc.

In another implementation-specific embodiment of the first methoddescribed, a separate RIBS muting pattern activation message may not beneeded for each node needed to activate muting patterns. Namely, a RANnode may be able to send a single RIBS muting pattern activation messageto a single node. This message may trigger activation of muting patternsin multiple nodes. As an example, all the nodes activating mutingpatterns may share the same stratum level or may have stratum levelequal or higher than a certain threshold.

For example, in the case of LTE, eNB1 may detect a number of interferingcells belonging to eNB2 and eNB3. eNB2 and eNB3 may have the samestratum level. In some embodiments, eNB1 may send a RIBS muting patternactivation request to eNB2. This may trigger activation of mutingpatterns on some or all of eNB2's cells, as well as on one or more ofeNB3's cells. Such list of cells may be determined by considering thenode requesting activation (e.g., by analyzing which cells are thestrongest interferers to that node either at the node or viacommunication with another central node) and/or by considering theStratum Level of the eNBs for which activation is triggered. The mutingpatterns activated at the same time may be coordinated, i.e. they mayhave some or all muted resources overlapping.

The latter method allows a reduction in the amount of signaling neededand simplifies activation procedures, while activating at the same timepatterns that would drastically reduce the interference experienced bythe requesting node.

In another implementation-specific embodiment of the first methoddescribed, a list of cells for which RIBS muting patternactivation/deactivation is requested may not be included in the messagecarrying the activation/deactivation request. The RAN node receiving theactivation/deactivation request may automatically calculate the cellsfor which muting patterns should be activated by means of analyzing therequesting node and eventually the cell for which interferenceprotection is requested. The node requested to activate/deactivatemuting patterns may therefore calculate which cells are the strongestinterferers for the requesting cell and by means of implementationenable/disable muting patterns on such cells. Alternately, thedetermination of the set of interferers may be done by another RAN node,in some embodiments.

FIG. 14 illustrates yet another example method, in this case implementedin a control node operating in a wireless communications network, forfacilitating over-the-air synchronization between base stationscontrolled by the control node. As shown at block 1410, the methodincludes sending a first configuration message to a first base station,the configuration message identifying a first reference signal mutingpattern for use in a first cell corresponding to the first base station.As shown at block 1420, a second configuration message is sent to asecond base station, the second configuration message identifying asecond reference signal muting pattern for use in a second cellcorresponding to the second base station. The first and second referencesignal muting patterns comprise one or more common muted resources. Insome embodiments, the first and second reference signal muting patternshave identical sets of muted resources.

In some embodiments, the method comprises sending a configurationmessage to each of three or more base stations, each configurationmessage identifying a reference signal muting pattern, and theidentified reference signal muting patterns for the three or more basestations all comprise one or more common muted resources. In some ofthese embodiments, the method comprises sending a configuration messageto each of a first set of base stations and to each of a second set ofbase stations, each configuration message identifying a reference signalmuting pattern, wherein the identified reference signal muting patternsfor the first set of base stations have a first set of muted resourcesin common and wherein the identified reference signal muting patternsfor the second set of base stations have a second set of muted resourcesin common, the first and second sets of muted resources being different.In some of these embodiments, the first set of base stations includesonly base stations having a first synchronization stratum level and thesecond set of base stations includes only base stations having a secondsynchronization stratum level, the first and second synchronizationstratum levels being different.

As discussed above, the several techniques described above may beimplemented in a base station or other node, typically using aprogrammed processing node. FIG. 15 illustrates an example processingnode 100, such as might be found in a base station or control node asdiscussed above. It will be appreciated that the processing circuits ofFIG. 15, as detailed below, may correspond in whole or in part to theprocessing circuits illustrated in FIG. 7, for example.

A computer program for controlling the node 100 to carry out a methodembodying any of the presently disclosed techniques is stored in aprogram storage 130, which comprises one or several memory devices. Dataused during the performance of a method embodying the present inventionis stored in a data storage 120, which also comprises one or more memorydevices. During performance of a method embodying the present invention,program steps are fetched from the program storage 130 and executed by aCentral Processing Unit (CPU) 110, retrieving data as required from thedata storage 120. Output information resulting from performance of amethod embodying the present invention, can be stored back in the datastorage 120, or sent to an Input/Output (I/O) interface circuit 140,which may include a network interface for sending and receiving data toand from other network nodes. The CPU 110 and its associated datastorage 120 and program storage 130 may collectively be referred to as a“processing circuit.” It will be appreciated that variations of thisprocessing circuit are possible, including circuits include one or moreof various types of programmable circuit elements, e.g.,microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors,field-programmable application-specific integrated circuits, and thelike, as well as processing circuits where all or part of the processingfunctionality described herein is performed using dedicated digitallogic.

Accordingly, in various embodiments of the invention, processingcircuits, such as the CPU 110, data storage 120, and program storage 130in FIG. 15, are configured to carry out one or more of the techniquesdescribed in detail above. Of course, it will be appreciated that notall of the steps of these techniques are necessarily performed in asingle microprocessor or even in a single module.

It will also be appreciated that all of the details and variationsdiscussed above in connection with the signal flow diagrams of FIGS. 9and 10 and the process flow diagrams of FIGS. 11-14 may apply to variousembodiments of the example nodes illustrated in FIG. 15.

It will further be appreciated that various aspects of theabove-described above can be understood as being carried out byfunctional “modules,” which may be program instructions executing on anappropriate processor circuit, hard-coded digital circuitry and/oranalog circuitry, or appropriate combinations thereof. FIG. 16illustrates an example base station 200, for example, which isconfigured for operation in a wireless communications network and tofacilitate over-the-air synchronization with a neighboring base station.Base station 200, which may have a physical configuration like that ofFIG. 7 and/or FIG. 15, for example, includes a receiving module 210 forreceiving a request for activation of a reference signal muting patternfor a cell supported by the base station, as well as an activatingmodule 220 for activating the reference signal muting pattern inresponse to the request. Base station 200 further includes a sendingmodule 230 for sending a message requesting activation of a referencesignal muting pattern for a cell supported by a second base station, inresponse to the request. The several variations described above inconnection with the process flow diagram of FIG. 12 are particularlyapplicable to base station 200, which may comprise further modulescorresponding to any of the other functional aspects of thosevariations.

Similarly, FIG. 17 illustrates an example control node 300 that isconfigured for operating in a wireless communications network and tofacilitate over-the-air synchronization among base stations. Controlnode 300 includes a receiving module 310 for receiving a first messagefrom the first base station, the first message indicating that referencesignal muting by at least a second neighbor cell of the plurality ofneighbor cells is needed. Control node 300 further includes a sendingmodule 320 for sending a second message to at least a second basestation, corresponding to the second neighbor cell, the second messagerequesting activation of a reference signal muting pattern for thesecond neighbor cell. Control node 300 still further includes adetermining module 330 for determining that a muting pattern should beactivated for at least the second neighbor cell based on at least theidentity of the first base station or the first cell, in response to thefirst message, wherein the first message does not identify the secondneighbor cell. The several variations described above in connection withthe process flow diagram of FIG. 13 are particularly applicable tocontrol node 300, which may comprise further modules corresponding toany of the other functional aspects of those variations.

FIG. 18 illustrates another view of an example control node 400, whichis also configured for operating in a wireless communications networkand to facilitate over-the-air synchronization among base stations.Control node 400 includes a first sending module 410 for sending a firstconfiguration message to a first base station, the configuration messageidentifying a first reference signal muting pattern for use in a firstcell corresponding to the first base station. Control node 400 furtherincludes a second sending module 420 for sending a second configurationmessage to a second base station, the second configuration messageidentifying a second reference signal muting pattern for use in a secondcell corresponding to the second base station, wherein the first andsecond reference signal muting patterns comprise one or more commonmuted resources. The several variations described above in connectionwith the process flow diagram of FIG. 14 are particularly applicable tocontrol node 400, which may comprise further modules corresponding toany of the other functional aspects of those variations.

Still further embodiments of the presently disclosed techniques andapparatus include computer program products comprising programinstructions that, when executed by an appropriate processing circuit ina base station, control node, or the like, causes the node to carry outone or more of the methods described above. In some embodiments, any oneor more of these computer program products may be embodied in acomputer-readable medium, including a non-transitory medium such as amemory, recordable disc, or other storage device.

Examples of several embodiments of the present techniques have beendescribed in detail above, with reference to the attached illustrationsof specific embodiments, and are summarized in a listing below. Becauseit is not possible, of course, to describe every conceivable combinationof components or techniques, those skilled in the art will appreciatethat the present invention can be implemented in other ways than thosespecifically set forth herein, without departing from essentialcharacteristics of the invention. The enumerated embodiments listedbelow and the illustrative embodiments discussed more generally aboveare thus to be considered in all respects as illustrative and notrestrictive.

EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Following are non-limiting examples of embodiments according to thepreviously described techniques and apparatus. It will be appreciated,in view of the preceding discussion, that several variations of theseembodiments are possible.

-   1. A method, in a base station operating in a wireless    communications network, for facilitating over-the-air    synchronization with a neighboring base station, the method    comprising:    -   determining that a first neighbor cell of a plurality of        neighbor cells is a desired synchronization source;    -   determining that a second neighbor cell of the plurality of        neighbor cells is interfering with or is likely to interfere        with a signal, from the first neighbor cell, that is used for        synchronization; and    -   sending, towards the second neighbor cell, a request for        activation of a reference signal muting pattern by the second        neighbor cell.-   2. The method of embodiment 1, further comprising subsequently    determining that the signal from the first neighbor cell is not    needed or is unavailable for synchronization and, in response,    sending a message, towards the second neighbor cell, indicating that    the reference signal muting pattern may be deactivated.-   3. The method of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the request for    activation is sent to a controlling node in the wireless    communications network, wherein the controlling node controls a base    station corresponding to the second cell.-   4. The method of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the request for    activation is sent to a base station corresponding to the second    cell.-   5. The method of any of embodiments 1-4, wherein determining that    the first neighbor cell is a desired synchronization source    comprises receiving synchronization information from at least the    first neighbor cell, the synchronization information indicating at    least one of a stratum level and synchronization status, and    evaluating the received synchronization information.-   6. The method of any of embodiments 1-5, wherein determining that    the first neighbor cell is a desired synchronization source is based    at least in part on a signal strength of a signal received from the    first neighbor cell.-   7. The method of any of embodiments 1-6, further comprising    receiving an indication of whether a reference signal muting pattern    is available for the second neighbor cell, wherein said sending of    the request is responsive to receiving said indication.-   8. The method of embodiment 7, wherein the indication comprises or    is associated with an identification of one or more muting patterns    available for the second neighbor cell.-   9. The method of any of embodiments 1-8, wherein the request for    activation of the reference signal muting pattern includes a list of    cells for which a muting pattern should be applied.-   10. The method of any of embodiments 1-9, wherein the request for    activation of the reference signal muting pattern includes an    identification of one or more resources that should be muted.-   11. The method of embodiment 10, wherein the identification of one    or more resources that should be muted comprises a subframe pattern,    or a pattern periodicity, or both.-   12. The method of any of embodiments 1-11, further comprising    performing synchronization based on the signal from the first    neighbor cell.-   13. The method of any of embodiments 1-12, further comprising    receiving information identifying which resources are being muted or    are to be muted by the second neighbor cell.-   14. A method, in a base station operating in a wireless    communications network, for facilitating over-the-air    synchronization by a neighboring base station, the method    comprising:    -   receiving a request for activation of a reference signal muting        pattern for a cell supported by the base station; and    -   activating the reference signal muting pattern in response to        the request.-   15. The method of embodiment 14, further comprising subsequently    receiving a request to deactivate the reference signal muting    pattern and, in response, deactivating the reference signal muting    pattern.-   16. The method of embodiment 14 or 15, further comprising first    receiving a request for synchronization information and responding    with synchronization information that includes at least an    indication that one or more reference signal muting patterns is/are    available.-   17. The method of embodiment 16, wherein the synchronization    information comprises an identification of one or more resources    that are muted in at least a first reference signal muting pattern.-   18. The method of embodiment 17, wherein the identification of one    or more resources that are muted comprises a subframe pattern, or a    pattern periodicity, or both.-   19. The method of any of embodiments 14-18, wherein the request for    activation is received from another base station via a base    station-to-base station interface.-   20. The method of any of embodiments 14-18, wherein the request for    activation is received from a controlling node in the wireless    communications network.-   21. The method of any of embodiments 14-20, further comprising    sending a message requesting activation of a reference signal muting    pattern for a cell supported by a second base station.-   22. The method of embodiment 21, wherein the message is sent to the    second base station.-   23. The method of embodiment 21, wherein the message is sent to a    control node in the wireless communications network.-   24. The method of any of embodiments 21-23, further comprising    selecting the second base station based on an evaluation of its    synchronization stratum level.-   25. The method of any of embodiments 21-24, further comprising    selecting the second base station based on an evaluation of its    potential for interfering with one or more cells supported by the    neighbor base station.-   26. A base station apparatus comprising a transceiver circuit    configured to communicate with one or more mobile stations and an    communications interface circuit configured to communicate with one    or more other base stations or with one or more control nodes, or    one or more of each, the base station apparatus further comprising a    processing circuit configured to control the transceiver circuit and    the communications interface circuit and further configured to carry    out any one or more of the methods of embodiments 1-25.-   27. A method, in a control node operating in a wireless    communications network, for facilitating over-the-air    synchronization by a first base station with a first neighbor cell    of a plurality of neighbor cells, the method comprising:    -   receiving a first message from the first base station, the first        message indicating that reference signal muting by at least a        second neighbor cell of the plurality of neighbor cells is        needed; and    -   sending a second message to at least a second base station        corresponding to the second neighbor cell, the second message        requesting activation of a reference signal muting pattern for        the second neighbor cell.-   28. The method of embodiment 27, further comprising sending the    second message or a corresponding message to at least a third base    station corresponding to a third neighbor cell, such that the second    message or corresponding message requests activation of a reference    signal muting pattern for the third neighbor cell.-   29. The method of embodiment 27, wherein the first message does not    identify the second neighbor cell and wherein the method further    comprises determining that a muting pattern should be activated for    at least the second neighbor cell based on at least the identity of    the requesting base station or its corresponding cell.-   30. The method of embodiment 29, wherein determining that a muting    pattern should be activated for at least the second neighbor cell    comprises determining that the second neighbor cell is an interferer    to a cell corresponding to the requesting base station.-   31. A method, in a control node operating in a wireless    communications network, for facilitating over-the-air    synchronization between base stations controlled by the control    node, the method comprising:    -   sending a first configuration message to a first base station,        the configuration message identifying a first reference signal        muting pattern for use in a first cell corresponding to the        first base station; and    -   sending a second configuration message to a second base station,        the second configuration message identifying a second reference        signal muting pattern for use in a second cell corresponding to        the second base station, wherein the first and second reference        signal muting patterns comprise one or more common muted        resources.-   32. The method of embodiment 31, wherein the first and second    reference signal muting patterns have identical sets of muted    resources.-   33. The method of embodiment 31 or 32, wherein the method comprises    sending a configuration message to each of three or more base    stations, each configuration message identifying a reference signal    muting pattern, and wherein the identified reference signal muting    patterns for the three or more base stations all comprise one or    more common muted resources.-   34. The method of embodiment 33, wherein the method comprises    sending a configuration message to each of a first set of base    stations and to each of a second set of base stations, each    configuration message identifying a reference signal muting pattern,    wherein the identified reference signal muting patterns for the    first set of base stations have a first set of muted resources in    common and wherein the identified reference signal muting patterns    for the second set of base stations have a second set of muted    resources in common, the first and second sets of muted resources    being different.-   35. The method of embodiment 34, wherein the first set of base    stations includes only base stations having a first synchronization    stratum level and the second set of base stations includes only base    stations having a second synchronization stratum level, the first    and second synchronization stratum levels being different.-   36. A control node apparatus comprising a communications interface    circuit configured to communicate with a plurality of base stations,    the control node apparatus further comprising a processing circuit    configured to control the communications interface circuit and    further configured to carry out any of the methods of embodiments    27-35.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, in a base station operating in awireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization by a neighboring base station, the method comprising:receiving a request for activation of a reference signal muting patternfor a cell supported by the base station; activating the referencesignal muting pattern in response to the request; and sending a messagerequesting activation of a reference signal muting pattern for a cellsupported by a second base station, in response to the request.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising first receiving a request forsynchronization information and responding with synchronizationinformation that includes at least an indication that one or morereference signal muting patterns is/are available.
 3. The method ofclaim 2, wherein the synchronization information comprises anidentification of one or more resources that are muted in at least afirst reference signal muting pattern.
 4. The method of claim 3, whereinthe identification of one or more resources that are muted comprises asubframe pattern, or a pattern periodicity, or both.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the request for activation is received from anotherbase station via a base station-to-base station interface.
 6. The methodof claim 1, wherein the request for activation is received from acontrolling node in the wireless communications network.
 7. The methodof claim 1, wherein the message is sent to the second base station. 8.The method of claim 1, wherein the message is sent to a control node inthe wireless communications network.
 9. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising selecting the second base station based on an evaluation ofits synchronization stratum level.
 10. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising selecting the second base station based on an evaluation ofits potential for interfering with one or more cells supported by theneighbor base station.
 11. A method, in a control node operating in awireless communications network, for facilitating over-the-airsynchronization by a first base station with a first neighbor cell of aplurality of neighbor cells, the method comprising: receiving a firstmessage from the first base station, the first message indicating thatreference signal muting by one or more of the plurality of neighborcells is needed; determining that a muting pattern should be activatedfor at least a second neighbor cell, based on at least the identity ofthe first base station or the first neighbor cell, wherein the firstmessage does not identify the second neighbor cell; and sending a secondmessage to at least a second base station, corresponding to the secondneighbor cell, the second message requesting activation of a referencesignal muting pattern for the second neighbor cell.
 12. The method ofclaim 11, further comprising sending the second message or acorresponding message to at least a third base station corresponding toa third neighbor cell, such that the second message or correspondingmessage requests activation of a reference signal muting pattern for thethird neighbor cell.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein determiningthat a muting pattern should be activated for at least the secondneighbor cell comprises determining that the second neighbor cell is aninterferer to a cell corresponding to the first base station.
 14. Amethod, in a control node operating in a wireless communicationsnetwork, for facilitating over-the-air synchronization between basestations controlled by the control node, the method comprising: sendinga first configuration message to a first set of base stations, the firstconfiguration message identifying a first reference signal mutingpattern, relating to a first set of common muted resources and for usein a first set of cells corresponding to the first set of base stations;and sending a second configuration message to a second set of basestations, the second configuration message identifying a secondreference signal muting pattern relating to a second set of common mutedresources and for use in a second set of cells corresponding to thesecond set of base stations, wherein the first and second sets of commonmuted resources comprise one or more muted resources common to bothsets, and wherein the first set of base stations includes only basestations having a first synchronization stratum level and the second setof base stations includes only base stations having a secondsynchronization stratum level different from the first synchronizationstratum level.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first and secondsets of common muted resources are identical sets of muted resources.16. The method of claim 14, wherein the method comprises sendingrespective configuration messages to each of one or more further basestations, each respective configuration message identifying a referencesignal muting pattern, and wherein the identified reference signalmuting patterns for the first set of base stations, the second set ofbase stations, and the one or more further base stations all relate toone or more common muted resources.
 17. The method of claim 14, whereinthe first and second sets of common muted resources differ by at leastone resource.
 18. A base station apparatus comprising: a communicationsinterface circuit configured to communicate with one or more other basestations or with one or more control nodes, or one or more of each; anda processing circuit configured to control the communications interfacecircuit and further configured to: receive, via the communicationsinterface circuit, a request for activation of a reference signal mutingpattern for a cell supported by the base station; activate the referencesignal muting pattern in response to the request; and send a messagerequesting activation of a reference signal muting pattern for a cellsupported by a second base station, in response to the request.
 19. Thebase station apparatus of claim 18, wherein the processing circuit isfurther configured to first receive a request for synchronizationinformation and to respond with synchronization information thatincludes at least an indication that one or more reference signal mutingpatterns is/are available.
 20. The base station apparatus of claim 19,wherein the synchronization information comprises an identification ofone or more resources that are muted in at least a first referencesignal muting pattern.
 21. The base station apparatus of claim 20,wherein the identification of one or more resources that are mutedcomprises a subframe pattern, or a pattern periodicity, or both.
 22. Thebase station apparatus of claim 18, wherein the processing circuit isfurther configured to select the second base station based on anevaluation of its synchronization stratum level.
 23. The base stationapparatus of claim 18, wherein the processing circuit is furtherconfigured to select the second base station based on an evaluation ofits potential for interfering with one or more cells supported by theneighbor base station.
 24. A control node apparatus comprising: acommunications interface circuit configured to communicate with aplurality of base stations; and a processing circuit configured tocontrol the communications interface circuit and further configured to:receive a first message from a first base station, via thecommunications interface circuit, the first message indicating thatreference signal muting by at least a second neighbor cell of theplurality of neighbor cells is needed; determine that a muting patternshould be activated for at least a second neighbor cell, based on atleast the identity of the first base station or the first neighbor cell,wherein the first message does not identify the second neighbor cell;and send, via the communications interface circuit, a second message toat least a second base station corresponding to the second neighborcell, the second message requesting activation of a reference signalmuting pattern for the second neighbor cell.
 25. The control nodeapparatus of claim 24, wherein the processing circuit is furtherconfigured to send the second message or a corresponding message to atleast a third base station corresponding to a third neighbor cell, suchthat the second message or corresponding message requests activation ofa reference signal muting pattern for the third neighbor cell.
 26. Thecontrol node apparatus of claim 24, wherein the processing circuit isconfigured to determine that the muting pattern should be activated forat least the second neighbor cell by determining that the secondneighbor cell is an interferer to a cell corresponding to the first basestation.
 27. A control node apparatus comprising: a communicationsinterface circuit configured to communicate with a plurality of basestations; and a processing circuit configured to control thecommunications interface circuit and further configured to: send a firstconfiguration message to a first set of base stations, via thecommunications interface circuit, the first configuration messageidentifying a first reference signal muting pattern, relating to a firstset of common muted resources and for use in a first set of cellscorresponding to the first set of base stations; and send a secondconfiguration message to a second set of base stations, via thecommunications interface circuit, the second configuration messageidentifying a second reference signal muting pattern, relating to asecond set of common muted resources and for use in a second set ofcells corresponding to the second set of base stations, wherein thefirst and second sets of common muted resources comprise one or moremuted resources common to both sets, and wherein the first set of basestations includes only base stations having a first synchronizationstratum level and the second set of base stations includes only basestations having a second synchronization stratum level different thanthe first synchronization stratum level.
 28. The control node apparatusof claim 27, wherein the first and second sets of common muted resourcesare identical sets of muted resources.
 29. The control node apparatus ofclaim 27, wherein the processing circuit is further configured to sendrespective configuration messages to each of one or more further basestations, each respective configuration message identifying a referencesignal muting pattern, and wherein the identified reference signalmuting patterns for the first set of base stations, the second set ofbase stations, and the one or more further base stations all relate toone or more common muted resources.
 30. The control node apparatus ofclaim 29, wherein the first and second sets of common muted resourcesdiffer by at least one resource.